noisecontrol: (CALM. PLACID. NOT IRRITATED.)
sakuraba neku ([personal profile] noisecontrol) wrote2013-10-31 09:57 pm

Emerald.

Hey.

And no, I don't want your autograph.
cerealpunner: (pic#6722662)

[personal profile] cerealpunner 2013-11-01 05:04 am (UTC)(link)
I'll try not to be too put out.

What's up?
unguilded: (aerial)

[personal profile] unguilded 2013-11-01 05:32 am (UTC)(link)
[ WAVES AT HIM!! ]

Hello again~!
cerealpunner: (pic#6722679)

[personal profile] cerealpunner 2013-11-01 05:45 am (UTC)(link)

Hey!

Feelin' real popular here.

unguilded: (every pace)

[personal profile] unguilded 2013-11-01 05:57 am (UTC)(link)
It must be a funny sort of popular, since it's suspicion!

What makes the other two teams more deserving of a vote than you, do you think?
cerealpunner: (pic#6722660)

[personal profile] cerealpunner 2013-11-01 06:17 am (UTC)(link)

Other than me being pretty much out and open with everyone? Not much, honestly.

My first vote was on Turquoise--their second one. And it was for the sake of getting majority on someone so there wouldn't be a multiple-way tie that could put mice even further in the advantage. Then, I voted Coral because they were seeming really inconsistent to me and I already explained to them that I don't see coincidence to be a viable excuse in a game like this. I wasn't convinced Tiger's Eye looked more suspicious, so I voted for Coral again.

Carnelian voted for Coral in the first round--by coin toss, they say. Kunzite voted for Ruby. Second round Carnelian voted Peridot, Kunzite voted Tiger's Eye... because Tiger's Eye was upset there was a vote on them so quick. So far, Kunzite's choices are both out. So I'd say Kunzite looks the most suspicious by that alone. But it's really not saying too much.

cerealpunner: (pic#6722665)

[personal profile] cerealpunner 2013-11-01 06:08 am (UTC)(link)

Honestly? I think I have less perspective than a lot of the teams that have been talking in private. I'm not sure if we even got a mouse or not, which makes me unsure if the team I've been working with most is a mouse or not.

If we're looking back on the last round, I'm not fully convinced Tiger's Eye was the mouse, it just seems like there was less reason to suspect them--which might be why they were voted most suspicious. But the suspicions on Coral are circumstantial at best and they have the excuse of the previous game like this effecting their behavior. Peridot, on the other hand, seems social, helpful, but their votings are completely wonky which throws everything more into confusion.

As for this round, neither Carnelian nor Kunzite have been really vocal in the votings and oustings. I'm getting to know Carnelian some but that doesn't say much, really... Carnelian voted Coral, Kunzite voted Tiger's Eye... part of that clear divide that showed up this last round. So if Tiger's Eye was the mouse, then I'd say Carnelian is the most suspicious and so is everyone else who voted for Coral. But it goes the reverse way, too.

cerealpunner: (pic#6722667)

[personal profile] cerealpunner 2013-11-01 07:07 am (UTC)(link)

I'm honestly not sure.

If we lucked out and got one in that first round with Turquoise, then that makes Coral the highest suspect since they were going off of their say. If not Turquoise, then Tiger's Eye was one, then Peridot and Coral are off the table.

But like I said, I still don't really see how Tiger's Eye was overly suspicious except that they weren't really suspicious.

cerealpunner: (pic#6722661)

[personal profile] cerealpunner 2013-11-01 07:13 am (UTC)(link)

Peridot's been really flaky with their information and their votes.

Amethyst... I've been sticking close to them if only because they extended a hand to me and I wanted to keep tabs on them in the first place. Amethyst is smart and tend to play to win. Plus Natasha is pretty smart herself and her former occupation means she's good at deception. So I figured sticking close would be better.

Their decisions with Coral just happened to fall in line with mine, but I still don't know if they're children or mice.

cerealpunner: (pic#6722720)

[personal profile] cerealpunner 2013-11-01 07:24 am (UTC)(link)

I was thinking Sapphire was a pity thing because they refused to vote in protest of the game, relating to their experience with a bad one previously.

Ruby... I have no idea.

cerealpunner: (pic#6722741)

[personal profile] cerealpunner 2013-11-01 07:29 am (UTC)(link)

Now that's just painting Peridot in a bad light and their votes have already been doing that for them.

cerealpunner: (pic#6722651)

[personal profile] cerealpunner 2013-11-01 08:39 pm (UTC)(link)
No idea. There's just things that don't really add up about the last round.
cerealpunner: (pic#6722651)

[personal profile] cerealpunner 2013-11-01 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Not yet. Still doing some chattering, but I'll be voting in a sec.
cerealpunner: (pic#6722727)

[personal profile] cerealpunner 2013-11-01 11:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Voted for them, too.

Looks like we'll get to ponder over it more when the polls close.
cerealpunner: (pic#6722756)

[personal profile] cerealpunner 2013-11-02 05:48 am (UTC)(link)

Now?

Amethyst is really getting antsy at you guys going at them.

Also, for the record, I was never pushed or bullied into decisions. I just said that they were insistent on things.

cerealpunner: (pic#6860879)

[personal profile] cerealpunner 2013-11-02 06:13 am (UTC)(link)

Why the sudden targetting, though?

We know Kunzite was the mouse last round. We should be focusing on Coral and Peridot and getting the mouse from that round eliminated.

cerealpunner: (pic#6722667)

[personal profile] cerealpunner 2013-11-02 06:36 am (UTC)(link)

It's all tangled together, fine, but we have a fifty-fifty shot to get a mouse between Peridot and Coral. Confusing that round with this current one isn't going to help us end the game sooner, you know. Let's focus on targetting one group at a time. We can keep in mind Amethyst's actions while doing that.